Go to SendWork
Full access

The FTC's nationwide ban is gone, but the FTC has gone after non-competes in pest control and more states now ban them for hourly workers. What your state allows, and the narrower protections that hold up when a trained tech leaves.
In a growing number of states, no. And where you still can, a broad non-compete for an hourly technician is the agreement most likely to fail and the one regulators are now looking at. The protection that holds up for a home-service business is narrower: a customer non-solicit limited to the people the tech actually served, a confidentiality clause for what you genuinely keep secret, and a fair agreement on training costs, each written to your state’s rules.
A non-compete is a clause that stops an employee working for a competitor, or starting their own business, for a set time and area after they leave. Whether it binds anyone is a question of state law, because there’s no federal ban.
The Federal Trade Commission’s 2024 rule, which would have banned most non-competes nationwide, never took effect. A federal court in Texas set it aside on August 20, 2024. The FTC dropped its appeals in September 2025 and formally removed the rule in February 2026. The FTC’s own page now says it “is not in effect and it is not enforceable”.
That doesn’t leave a trade employer in the clear. The FTC said it would keep going after non-competes case by case under the antitrust laws, and it has done so in a home-service trade. In April 2026 it acted against Rollins, the pest-control company. Its non-competes typically barred employees, pest-control technicians included, from the industry for two years within 75 miles of any of its locations. The final order, in June 2026, freed more than 18,000 employees. The FTC’s chairman also sent warning letters to 13 other pest-control companies.
For a technician paid by the hour, the answer depends heavily on the state, and the trend is toward bans and income floors. Some current examples, each read at the state’s own statute or labor department:
| State | Non-compete for a technician |
|---|---|
| California, Minnesota, North Dakota | Void for employees. California also voids them whatever state the contract was signed in. |
| Oklahoma | A former employee can compete; only directly soliciting your established customers can be barred. |
| Wyoming | Void for contracts from July 1, 2025, with narrow exceptions such as executives and training costs. |
| Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Virginia | Not enforceable against employees entitled to overtime, which covers most hourly techs. |
| Tennessee | Banned from July 1, 2026 below $70,000 a year; for hourly staff, the rate × 40 × 52. |
| Illinois | Only above $75,000 a year ($80,000 from 2027). Void for most people employed in construction. |
| Washington | Only above $126,858.83 in 2026. From June 30, 2027, all non-competes are void, including existing ones. |
| Oregon | Only for salaried exempt employees earning above $119,541 in 2026, with a written offer two weeks before they start. |
| Colorado | Only for highly compensated workers ($130,014 in 2026) and to protect trade secrets, with a separate signed notice. |
| District of Columbia | Banned under $162,164 in 2026. |
| Texas, Florida | Enforceable if reasonable in time, area and scope and tied to a legitimate business interest. |
Several other states, including Maine, Maryland and New Hampshire, ban them for lower-paid workers. New York’s Senate has passed a statewide ban, but it isn’t law. Thresholds change every year, so check your state labor department before you rely on any of these figures.
Even then, the state’s process rules decide whether it survives. Illinois requires you to advise the employee in writing to see a lawyer and give 14 days to review. Massachusetts caps the restriction at 12 months and requires garden leave or other agreed payment. Virginia won’t enforce one against someone you fire without cause unless you pay severance. Miss a step and the clause fails, even for a well-paid manager.
Don’t keep an unenforceable non-compete in your paperwork as a bluff, either. California treats entering into or trying to enforce a void clause as a violation the employee can sue over. Virginia fines $10,000 per violation, and that includes threatening to enforce one.
If the real worry is a tech taking the customers they serve, rather than working somewhere else, there are narrower tools for that. Most states treat them more kindly than a non-compete.

The other side of this is keeping the technicians you’ve trained. Our guide to retirement plans for contractors compares one benefit that can help.
If your techs are hourly and your state bans non-competes for them or sets an income floor they don’t reach, leave it out. If you’re in a state that still allows one, ask whether it would survive the state’s process rules and whether a narrow non-solicit would protect what you actually care about. Whatever you choose, have an employment lawyer in your state review the agreement before anyone signs it.
For the rest of the hiring paperwork, see what hiring your first employee costs, and worker classification if any of your techs work as contractors. The customer relationships worth protecting often start with maintenance plans. More is in our USA business admin guides.
WHEN A TECH HANDS BACK THE KEYS
Keep the customer relationship with the business, not one phone.
The customer list worth protecting is the one with every visit and service note on it. SendWork keeps client records and job history with the business, rather than in one technician’s contacts and texts.